Re: suggestion for distribution: mega archive
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Philip Brown <phil bolthole com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list mail gnome org
- Subject: Re: suggestion for distribution: mega archive
- Date: 10 Aug 2002 23:44:36 -0400
Philip Brown <phil bolthole com> writes:
> I would like to suggest that since the number of required libraries for gtk
> is now considerable, that the gtk project consider distribution a
> mega-archive, with **all** required libraries beyond a plain X11R6
> distribution, with a single top level configure script.
>
> Certainly, offering the libraries separately is nice, for applying
> incremental patches. But when trying to bootstrap a vanilla system, it
> would be a real timesaver (not to mention hasslesaver) to have such an
> archive.
>
I did this once (in CVS as gtk+-enterprise-edition) but it took me
literally about 3 days to get it to compile, and it looked like it was
going to break every time anyone changed the Makefiles at all. So I
decided I wasn't personally going to maintain it. ;-)
The basic approach is still in CVS, bitrotted, but if someone wanted
to maintain this they could have a look at how I did it.
The reason it's hard is that you have to make sure pango/atk will link
to a GLib that hasn't been installed yet, and gtk+ will link to a
pango/atk/glib that hasn't been installed yet. Makefile hell.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]