Re: [Patch] Warning fixes for glib

On 29 Oct, Owen Taylor wrote:

> Looks fine with one very small comment:

> The reason for this is that we can fix problems with redefined
> symbols where the standard header is first, but not where it
> is second. Also, having some sort of standard for the ordering
> of include headers makes it easier to find things.

Makes sense. Will commit after the correction.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]