Re: Review of accelerator changes
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Review of accelerator changes
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 16:27:47 +0100 (CET)
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > also, changing accels is not so easy if they need to be combined
> > with modifiers by default, and accidental changes can be reverted
> > just as easy as the wee made.
>
> Not if you're a naive user and aren't sure how the change happenned in
> the first place. I predict that we will get zillions of bug reports
> about this if it's the default.
we've been having this as default for the last 4 years and did not
get zillions of bug reports.
> > > Unexpected for everybody the first time
> > > it happens, I'd dare say.
> >
> > well, pretty much _everything_ new is going to be unexpected, it wouldn't
> > be something new other wise (if you come from a different toolkit), that
> > doesn't autmatically make it bad though.
>
> OK, my vote is that these are evil. Consider it one vote.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I think configurable keybindings are cool, but I
> don't see why they have to be configurable via keystrokes, there could
> just as well be some onscreen utility or popup for doing this that at
> least would make it less likely to happen by accident or 'silently' from
> the users' point of view.
that'd require special handling by every app and just not be a standard
toolkit feature anymore.
>
> -Bill
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]