Re: g_value_ types ...

On Tue, 8 May 2001, Tim Janik wrote:
> > I think all of these could be done with G_TYPE_BOXED - using a new
> > fundemental type is just a small efficiency win and for a lot of
> > things will be lost in the noise.
> to put this into perspective, we have had a dynamically working
> g_type_register_fundemental() right from the start.

        Fine, I'll use a boxed type - it's no problem.



 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]