Re: builddirs (was Re: ATK dependency added to GTK+)
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Erik Walthinsen <omega temple-baptist com>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, <gstreamer-devel lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: builddirs (was Re: ATK dependency added to GTK+)
- Date: 03 May 2001 22:36:44 -0400
Erik Walthinsen <omega temple-baptist com> writes:
> Hmm, I haven't played with pkg-config much yet. But having the
> ${pcfiledir} variable would make it that much easier to make these
> builddirs 'relocatable', i.e. the paths are based on the actual current
> location of the builddir.
>
> An issue that definitely is relevant though is that the ldflags would
> probably have a libtool archive listed by path, which doesn't work at all
> if you're not using libtool. How can that be worked around? Do we assume
> that if $USING_LIBTOOL (or somesuch) isn't defined, pkg-config has to put
> in '-static -Lpath -lname' instead of 'path/libname.la'? Do we even want
> to solve that problem?
The .la would only be in the special builddir .pc files, making those
libtool-specific doesn't really bother me. Installed .pc files would
still be the same as before.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]