Re: closure threading issues
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Sebastian Wilhelmi <wilhelmi ira uka de>, Karl Nelson <kenelson ece ucdavis edu>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: closure threading issues
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
On 30 Mar 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> I think the conceptual answer to this is really simple:
>
> - Class closures, and their associated data are associated with the
> signal, which is associated with the class.
> - The class won't be unloaded until the object is finalized
> - The object won't be finalized until the call is finished.
>
> So class closures don't need refcounting during invocation, and
> since I don't think class closures should be mutating themselves
> during invocation, they don't need locking either.
as every other closure, class closures need to mutate the in_marshal
flag to decide about pre and post notify callback invocation, also
for overridable class closures i don't think we can skip
reference counting.
skipping reference counting for class closures isn't a viable approach
btw, unless class closure invocation wouldn't use g_closure_invoke().
i don't think i really understand how you imagine things to work...
all i know is that our current setup is likely to break with class
closures being used in two different threads.
>
> Regards,
> Owen
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]