Re: GtkLabel patch

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes: 
> i'm afraid this was not totaly bogus. we do in fact turn the type checks
> off for stable branches, and assuming that most distributors don't change
> the debugging default, stable gtk versions get shipped without type
> checks.

Sorry, you're right. I was thinking of G_DISABLE_CHECKS not
GTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS. We ship with checks turned on but not casts.
 
> i don't understand. do you mean that you disagree that code could
> could trigger warnings from the class cast checks? what do you want,
> a code example?
> 

I disagree that this problem would happen often enough to make any
speed impact worth it. Since it's a GTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS thing, sure,
you're right.

Havoc