Re: missing g_signal macros

[Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>]

Hi,

Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:

> >  g_signal_connect_after()
> 
> No real opinion on this one.
>   
> >  g_signal_handlers_disconnect_by_data()
> > 
> >  g_signal_handlers_block_by_data()
> >  g_signal_handlers_unblock_by_data()
> 
> Tim specifically did not want to add these and I tend to agree
> with him... if you call g_signal_handlers_disconnect_by_data()
> and you can't be absolutely sure that no one else has a pointer
> to the data you are disconnecting, then your code has a 
> latent bug in it.

Agreed. What about adding g_signal_connect_after() then? Tim, do 
you have an opinion on this one?


Salut, Sven