Re: G_IO_CHANNEL_*_LINE_TERM unnecessary



Ron Steinke <rsteinke w-link net> writes:

> 	I'd like to get rid of the G_IO_CHANNEL_*_LINE_TERM macros
> in cvs. When I was implementing g_io_channel_get_line(), I thought
> they'd be necessary, but they're not. Any objections (they're currently
> API, but I don't believe they're being utilized)?

Go ahead. I don't think it is clearer to use these than to 
simply use "\r\n" or whatever in your code if you need to 
set the line terminator to something explicitely.

Regards,
                                        Owen




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]