Re: State of gtk head for win32, was Re: GIOChannel diff committed

["Andrew J. Lanoix" <alanoix umich edu>]

--On Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:29 PM +0200 Hans Breuer <hans breuer org> 
wrote:

> At 19:52 23.07.01 -0400, Andrew J. Lanoix wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >Hans,
> >What is the state of gtk head on win32? I see that you have been
> submitting  >patching to it.
> >
> (kind of cross posting to gimpwin-dev yahoogroups com)
>
> Currently the only makefiles actively maintained in CVS are the
> msvc makefiles, but it should be simple to adapt the required
> changes to the mingw makefiles (I've recently done it for the
> glib build, with a simpler approach to built dlls, than the
> original one)
Ok, that is news to me. I'll let you (Hans) worry about the mingw makfile 
problem. We still have to deal with education problem relating to it.

> IMHO the best way to get information on the status of any project
> in GNOME CVS is to read the ChangeLog. Guess for what name you may
> want to search to get the win32 specific status ...
> But 'win32' would work too.
Yes I did that but it doesn't answer my question. Which is: Should people 
still be recommended to use the production branch or head?

Andy
PS. I'm on vacation from the 27th to the 5th.