Re: Patch for definition of NULL
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Mark Murnane Sun COM
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org, timj gtk org
- Subject: Re: Patch for definition of NULL
- Date: 11 Jul 2001 12:03:37 -0400
Mark Murnane <Mark Murnane Sun COM> writes:
> Hi,
>
> When compiling glib with Sun's Forte compiler, we run across problems
> with the definition of NULL. On Solaris systems NULL is defined as
> either 0 or 0L, depending on whether or not you're compiling 64-bit
> binaries. I've put a conditional define in gmacros.h which only applied
> when Forte is being used. Does anyone have any objections if I commit
> this?
I'm tending to thing that the right thing here is to simply include
stddef.h to get the corrent definition of NULL. Trying to match
all systems stddef.h with #ifdef's is a rats-nest I'd much
prefer not to enter.
Tim has expressed his opposition to this, but I can't agree. If
someone doesn't want the fundemental basic stuff defined in stddef.h,
they aren't going to want all the stuff the GLib headers drag in as
well.
Regards,
Owen
> Index: glib/gmacros.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/glib/glib/gmacros.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -r1.3 gmacros.h
> --- glib/gmacros.h 2001/06/23 13:55:07 1.3
> +++ glib/gmacros.h 2001/07/11 15:37:18
> @@ -107,6 +107,15 @@
> * been defined. It is assumed that if they are already
> * defined then the current definition is correct.
> */
> +
> +#if !defined NULL && defined __SUNPRO_C
> +# if defined (_LP64) && !defined (__cplusplus)
> +# define NULL 0L
> +# else
> +# define NULL 0
> +# endif
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef NULL
> # ifdef __cplusplus
> # define NULL (0L)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]