Re: GValue exchange

On 24 Jan 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> Any chance you'd take a patch to move from exchange_func to
> convert_func?
> I really want the int->string, etc. conversions, but I think
> string->int is a bad idea plus it's a pain to write.
> Owen says the rationale for exchange_func is so you can implement
> bidirectional conversions with only one function, but I am willing to
> type the extra functions and submit them in my patch. ;-)

yes, basically that was the tenor of my last mail on that
subject ;)

> Havoc


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]