Re: Fwd: Re: URIs vs. half-baked URIs [glib PATCH]



On August 24, 2001 03:36 pm, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>   Well I misread that part.
>   However using file:///path is I think a better practice than
> file:/path . Though file:/path is a hierachical URI per the RFC 2396
> the RFC 1738 defining the file scheme in section 3.10 explictely say

RFC 2396 revises and replaces both RFC's 1738 and 1808, so why would you 
choose to follow 1738 and ignore 2396? and 2396 is really not that new either 
(Aug '98)

from a usability standpoint, i really enjoy not having to type 3 /s in a row 
(even though konqi does let you do that too)

-- 
Aaron Seigo




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]