Re: g_hash_table_resize (#59026)

[Daniel Egger <egger suse de>]

Am 19 Aug 2001 14:00:13 -0400 schrieb Owen Taylor:

> But gcc-2.96, which generally has considerably better optimization
> misses the fact that the two branches of the if are exclusive.
 
> And its dependent on processor ... when I tried timing multiple
> versions there was very little consistency in ordering between
> a PIII and a celeron. (With total variation being small --
> a few percent even in my artificial micro-benchmark)

Which benchmark is this? I can contribute some data for PPC and various
compilers as well as sparc64, sparc32, Alpha, Pentium IV, Athlon,
Itanium and various others if wanted. :) But I'm interested on seeing
how this performs in comparison on PPC with gcc 3.0.1.

Servus,
       Daniel