Re: gdk-config or gdk option to gtk-config

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Yasushi Shoji <yashi yashi com> writes:
> At 14 Oct 2000 21:49:27 -0400,
> Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> wrote:
> > > is there any reason we don't have gdk-config or gdk option to
> > > gtk-config?
> > > 
> > > is it just 'nobody's done it' kinda thing?
> > 
> > GDK is more or less unsupported for use without GTK. (So far no one
> > has wanted to do that.)
> 
> i'm kinda interested in using Gdk w/o Gtk.  would you accept
> gdk-config-2.0 or patch for 'gdk' option to gtk-config-2.0?
>

Well, I guess I would, but Owen and Tim have to make this decision. ;-)
 
> which one would be better?

I would say the 'gdk' option.

Hmm, for that matter, I think the pkg-config stuff already supports
GDK separately (pkg-config --libs gdk-2.0 or something, see the .pc
files)

Havoc