Re: GTK+ Future timelines and features, help needed ???
- From: Michael Meeks <michael helixcode com>
- To: Bryan Patrick Coleman <bpcolema uncg edu>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GTK+ Future timelines and features, help needed ???
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Bryan Patrick Coleman wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Dean Jones wrote:
> >the Bonobo object model, GtkExtra stuff. What the toolkit can do,
> I thought Bonobo was a python thing.
Bonobo is a component object model; it is implemented in C, it
currently has no C++ bindings, but they would be appreciated, however it
presents rather a moving target.
> >can't do, and can do better. I am not quite sure if I would best
> >fit at the GTK+ layer, or GNOME toolkit layer/Bonobo stuff. If I knew
> >the plans of where GTK+ was going, I could start picking things to
> >start hacking on. And interesting issue would br GTK+ feature parity
> >with Qt, if it is not already ahead... ;-)
There is a large amount of interest in improving the support for
C++ programmers both in Gtk and Gnome, we need you all over the
shop. Contact Karl Nelson <firstname.lastname@example.org> who I'm sure will
point you at a whole swathe of code that needs some loving care. You sound
like an ideal developer, don't go away =)
email@example.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
] [Thread Prev