Re: Text buffer API

[Darin Adler <darin eazel com>]

on 7/10/00 2:52 PM, Havoc Pennington at hp@redhat.com wrote:

> We already have "interactive" versions of insert_text and
> delete_text. Would it be sufficient to make a boolean arg to the
> virtual function indicating interactivity?

Probably.

While I'm not so sure what "interactive" means, I'm also not so sure what
the exact semantic of "user change" is. See my other message in response to
Derek S. for more details that may help elucidate.

    -- Darin