Re: GDate API Rename Patch #2



Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:

> This patch looks OK to me. Any objections to applying it?

If it is the _get patch, it should be OK.

I do not think the Islamic date functions should go into Glib.  GDate
is fairly questionable by itself --- it is not bad at all, in fact we
use GDate in Evolution, but Glib should not be a dumpster for
replacements for everything that sucks in the C library.

  Federico




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]