Re: Consensus on getter conventions?

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On 24 Aug 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> If this goes in I'd like to see G_CONST rather than gconst since I
> would understand this to be a preprocessor-time configuration thing
> like G_GNUC_PRINTF. Also I've seen other packages that use uppercase
> CONST for this (Tcl/Tk I believe).

right, i meant to poitn that out as well.
though i wouldn't be immensly opposed to using GCONST instead of
G_CONST, since we already use that for pointer/int type conversions
and it simply looks less cluttered.
remark for owen, it'd also come closer to gconstpointer ;)

> 
> Havoc
> 

---
ciaoTJ