Re: glib + gecos

On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Tomas Ogren wrote:

> I really think that glib should cut away the non-name part from the
> gecos field when extracting 'g_real_name' ..
> The gecos-field normally contains name, phone-number etc.. in a
> comma-separated list.. We only want the name-part when checking for the
> name.. right?

yes, that's also what the windows equivalent means to provide.
so the ,.* part not getting stripped is a bug in actual code.

> /Tomas


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]