Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel gnu org>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 13:45:29 -0600
> None of these are trivial applications. While GtkObject may not
> be ideal for all purposes, it seems to
> work reasonably well for doing large-granualarity C-based
> object system.
Just voicing my opinion here: I agree with Owen completely here.
> What is your timeline for improving GtkObject to the point you would
> feel comfortable with people using it for non-GUI purposes? Is there a
> reason why this couldn't be done now, and the improvments made as part
> of the separate library?
I personally would like to see nice macros to set up the object class
hierarchy in a simpler fashion.
Even if it assumes some hardcoded "names" and only in the
implementation side of things:
GTK_OBJECT_MAKE_TYPE(parent_object_type, new_type, Pare)
] [Thread Prev