Re: inline and glib.h (was Re: ObjC and `glib.h')
- From: Guillaume Laurent <glaurent worldnet fr>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: inline and glib.h (was Re: ObjC and `glib.h')
- Date: 03 Oct 1998 13:39:06 +0200
Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org> writes:
> > # define inline /* don't inline, then */ <---- potential trouble here
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> how would that cause problems for a compiler that doesn't understand
> "inline" at all?
It wouldn't, I didn't make myself clear, sorry. The C compiler is not
the problem, a C++ compiler is, though.
> > It seems trouble would occur if glib is configured for a C compiler
> > which absolutely does not understand "inline", and glib.h is included
> > from C++.
>
> hm, could you extend on what the trouble actually is and provide a test
> case (including information about the system and the C/C++ compiler
> you are running)?
Suppose your C compiler does not understand 'inline'. glib.h is
configured to #define 'inline' away. If you happen to include glib.h
with such a configuration from C++, where 'inline' is standard, you're
in trouble. Tero and some Gtk-- users ran into this problem recently,
due to an old glibconfig.h lying in the wrong place.
I suppose adding
#ifdef __cplusplus
#define G_HAVE___INLINE 1
#define G_HAVE___INLINE__ 1
#define G_HAVE_INLINE 1
#endif
would do the trick...
BTW, why are g_error(), g_message() and g_warning() defined with a
plain 'inline', like this :
static inline void
g_error (const gchar *format,
...)
while everywhere else in glib.h, G_INLINE_FUNC is used ?
--
Guillaume.
http://www.worldnet.fr/~glaurent
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]