RE: gtk_ctree_is_visible()

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Lars Hamann wrote:

> Hi Tim!
> 
> On 06-Aug-98 Tim Janik wrote:
> 
> > i think the name of gtk_ctree_is_visible() should better be changed
> > to gtk_ctree_node_expanded(), since that is what it actually returns
> > (including the parents, so gtk_ctree_node_fully_expanded() would also
> > be an option).
> 
> No, not really. gtk_ctree_is_visible returns TRUE if all of nodes parents
> are expanded, i.e. if gtk_ctree_is_visible (node) == TRUE then node actually
> is in GTK_CLIST (ctree)->row_list.
> I would expect gtk_ctree_node_expanded to return GTK_CTREE_ROW (node)->expanded.

hm, what about _fully_expanded() or is_listed() or something like that then?

[owen, what about your ever-so-good-function-name-ideas? ;)]

> 
> > it's actually very easy to confuse with
> > GtkVisibility gtk_clist_row_is_visible (GtkCList * clist,
> >                                         gint row);
> > which returns whether the specified row is inside the viewable portion
> > of the scrolled window or not.
> 
> I don't object to rename this function too, but I don't like
> gtk_ctree_node_expanded...
> 

> 
> bye,
>   Lars
> 

---
ciaoTJ