Damon Oberholster schrieb:
Sorry was just getting some other pov. No offense meant or anything. What libglademm list are you talking about? There doesn't seem to be a libglademm-list gnome org
OSS developers tend to get quite angry if they get the impression that their valuable time and effort (e.g. answering an email) was wasted. Just wanted to teach^Wtell that you should have precised your question when posting to another list (especially after getting an initial hint). IIRC (Murray did not disagree the correct list would have been gnomemm-list [which is hardly documented anywhere IIRC]). But don't try again, there's no greater authority than Murray (maintainer) when it comes to libglademm (and we all tend to be subscribed all lists [I would never dare to state that I read all lists]) and he already answered on gtkmm-list. Since Murray also (sometimes?) reads the glademm list you had a good chance to get the definitive answer by your first post. And since every developer proposed a different road you have to choose yourself. Off to work on a monotone<->cvs gateway Christof
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature