RE: [gnomemm] stubs and skels

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

Yes, I think so.

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bradley Bell [mailto:bradleyb u washington edu] 
> Sent: Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2003 19:47
> To: Cumming Murray (COMNEON Linz); gnomemm-list gnome org
> Subject: RE: [gnomemm] stubs and skels
> 
> 
> Should I send in a patch that will just apply the version of
> libbonobomm_servers to those libs?
> 
> -brad
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gnomemm-list-admin gnome org
> > [mailto:gnomemm-list-admin gnome org]On Behalf Of
> > Murray Cumming Comneon com
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:16 PM
> > To: btb debian org; gnomemm-list gnome org
> > Subject: RE: [gnomemm] stubs and skels
> >
> >
> > I guess we need to fix something in our build files then.
> >
> > Murray Cumming
> > murrayc usa net
> > www.murrayc.com
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bradley Bell [mailto:btb debian org]
> > > Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2003 21:57
> > > To: gnomemm-list gnome org
> > > Subject: [gnomemm] stubs and skels
> > >
> > >
> > > I noticed that the library version numbers of
> > > libbonobomm-generated-stubs
> > > and libbonobomm-generated-skels has not changed between
> > > releases.  Has the
> > > interface really not changed?  Apologies if this is a stupid
> > > question, I
> > > haven't really got a clue how this auto-generation works.
> > >
> > > -brad
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnomemm-list mailing list
> > > gnomemm-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemm-list
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnomemm-list mailing list
> > gnomemm-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemm-list
> >
>