RE: [gnomemm] Re: libglademm-2 functions for signals

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> any special reason why there isn't 
> galde_xml_signal_autoconnect? too slow? not portable? what's 
> the issue?

I guess, but I don't know:
1. In C+++, you connect signals not just to global functions, but to methods
of _instances_. Glade can't know about the instance.
2. In C++, it's difficult to discover function's address at runtime because
of C++ name mangling, which isn't really standardised.

But, there was a solution for this in libglademm 1 and I would like someone
to investigate it.

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com