Re: [gnomemm] foocanvasmm

[ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>]

On 15 Feb 2003, Murray Cumming wrote:

> > 2. The namespace
> > Gnome::FooCanvas would be the obvious answer,
> 
> But foocanvas isn't part of GNOME.

A common toplevel namespace would still be nice.

> >  however, since the canvas
> > widget itself is called FooCanvas, this doesn't really fly (a conflict
> > between namespace Gnome::FooCanvas and type FooCanvas, when inside
> > Gnome::FooCanvas). I went with Gnome::FCanvas but obviously this is
> > sub-optimal.
> 
> I suggest FooCanvas::Canvas and FooCanvas::Item, etc.

How would a FooCanvas toplevel namespace work with there being also a 
FooCanvas toplevel type?

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
A legrosszabb dolog a cenzúrában az, hogy XXXXXXXXXX.