RE: [gnomemm] (no subject)
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: lichte ctcis net, gnomemm-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: [gnomemm] (no subject)
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:29:16 +0200
Please see the bottom of this:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnomemm-list/2003-February/msg00005.html
You should _not_ need to know this if you are using the gnomemm-all package.
If you do then it's a bug. You should report bugs.
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cletus Lichte [mailto:lichte ctcis net]
> Sent: Dienstag, 15. April 2003 04:01
> To: gnomemm-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: [gnomemm] (no subject)
>
>
> Yes, this is what I meant. I'm sorry for not being accurate in my
> description of the problem! All I need is the order that the
> packages
> need to be built and I'll build and install each package myself. I'm
> just not sure which needs to be first, etc. Thanks again for
> your help.
>
> On 2003.04.14 17:43 Michael Tindal wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 02:52, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > > > From: Cletus Lichte [mailto:lichte ctcis net]
> > > > Ok, I've got ORBit-cpp installed and that part of configure
> > > > works now.
> > > > The problem is that when I try to configure all the
> packages from
> > the
> > > > top level, everything crashes if I don't have that
> package already
> >
> > > > installed on my system!
> > >
> > > What crashes? What package?
> >
> > I think what he is referring to is not a crash, but if you run
> > configure
> > in the top directory after unpacking the gnomemm-all
> tarball, it wont
> > build because it tries to configure each package then, and
> since some
> > packages depend on other packages, it will fail because theyre not
> > installed. Does that make any sense?
> >
> > Like how libbonobuimm depends on libbonobomm,
> > gnomemm-all will try to configure libbonobuimm, which will fail,
> > since libbonobomm is not installed yet.
> >
> > The only solution I can see is a nasty hack involving
> prefix's, and I
> > think thats surely less than optimal. Perhaps someone else can
> > provide
> > a better solution.
> >
> > > Murray Cumming
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnomemm-list mailing list
> > gnomemm-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemm-list
> >
>
> --
> /"\
> \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | "The opposite of a profound truth
> X * NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | is a profound truth, too."
> / \ * NO MSWord docs in e-mail| -- Nils Bohr
> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> gnomemm-list mailing list
> gnomemm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemm-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]