Re: [gnomemm] gconfmm 2.0.0 release candidate

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 14:22, triendl klaus wrote:
> it would be nice to have a class in the api which does the initialisation job because the GConf-system can be initialised before any global GConf-object is created (also applies to the glib-threading api).
> 
> e.g. i have an application using a GConf::Client in the global namespace (instantiated in front of main()); therefore i wrote a class which just calls init() in its ctor - instantiated just before the GConf::Client object.

People would still have to worry about the order of initialization of
static objects, so I don't think this would make it much simpler.

If all of these init() methods have the same signature, you might think
about adding an initialization class to glibmm.
 
-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com