Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: 1.2
- From: Bruno Hertz <brrhtz yahoo de>
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: 1.2
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:20:04 +0100
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 14:55 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Yes, that will work. But if there is a -O2 hardcoded somewhere, both -O2
> and the CFLAGS will be used.
Sure. Still, in case one re-configures often, which implies
rebuilding the makefiles, editing resp. patching them all
the time might become a kind of a tedious task.
So, to avoid this I then guess the options are
* pass CFLAGS (resp. I think CCFLAGS for g++) to configure via
CFLAGS=blah ./configure ...
* or do the same during make via
CFLAGS=blah make
or
make -DCFLAGS=blah
Logging the build like make 2>&1 | tee make.log and grep'ing
those logs for O2 then might provide a reasonably easy way to
ensure no optimization is used.
And if there's still some hardcoded optimization, well bad luck :)
Maybe editing Makefile.in can fix that ...
Regards, Bruno.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]