Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Open discussion about ILS/SIP/FWD

[daniel huhardeaux <devel tootai net>]

Damien Sandras a écrit :

> Hello to all,
>
> I have thought a bit more to this and finally I think that only support
> one provider for registration is bad, even if they have a large
> community of users and additional services like conferences (not sure it
> is free though).
>
> We are a free software community, with a small gnomemeeting community,
> let's keep it that way. 
>
> To summarize :
> - 1.2 will keep ILS
> - 2.00 will have SIP support and a new registration mechanism on
> seconix.com. If possible, that registration mechanism based on LDAP and
> a SIP registrar/proxy, will be able to register users to
> FreeWorldDialup. If it is not possible, users will still be free to drop
> seconix (like they can now) and register to FWD only.
>
> Any comments welcome.
>  
Did I misunderstood something? You asked if registration to seconix LDAP 
server could in the mean time register to FWD and this is the only 
registration possibility, or it was an additional feature to seconix, 
people still able to register to X SIP registrar simultaneously? If the 
first, bad idea ;-)

BTW, on how much registrar (SIP or H323) will be possible to register 
simultaneously (X-Lite has 10)

> Le vendredi 27 août 2004 à 09:00 -0600, Simon Wood a écrit :
>  
>
> > Hi all,
> > I would think that whatever future capabilities of Gnomemeeting are, you want to think carefully about droping major bits code - tying users to old (unsupported) versions on code is a bad idea.
> >
> > If you can add support for LDAP and SIP as extras then that's a good idea, although I would be suspect of forcing users to use a sole SIP provider is not. They might be free now, but could start charging later.
> >
> > If Gnomemeeting could become the 'gaim' of video conferencing then that would cool. ;-)
> >    
--
Daniel