Then let's do it! But I don't know if electronic signatures would be valid. Le jeudi 26 août 2004 à 14:06 +0300, Johnny Strom a écrit : > Rikard Johnels wrote: > > On Thursday 26 August 2004 11.32, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > >>Would be a rather bad news... > >> > >>http://www.smcc.demon.nl/webcam/ > > > > > > What is the "I'm bound by an NDA" he refers to? > > Is there anything we as a community can do? > > I hate to see his work go to waste! > > > > Well he said he is not under NDA anymore: > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0408.3/0270.html > > So I don't know perhaps we could send emails to philips and > ask if it is ok for him to publish the pwcx code under GPL. > > So should we organize a community thing where all Gnomemeeting users > add there names to a list? and then we ask philips and others that are > involved to give permission so that he can release the pwcx code this > would be the best long term solution. > > I can help write the email and other things that needs to be done for > this to happen. > > Cheers Johnny > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=