Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] 64bit patch

[Miguel Rodríguez <migrax terra es>]

El mi�09-10-2002 a las 18:14, Alexander Larsson escribi� On 9 Oct 2002, Miguel Rodr�ez wrote:
> 
> > Ummm. It's true that NULL is c++ is defined as 0 (Stroustrup in his book
> > even mentions that NULL shouldn't be used, and that you should use just
> > 0).
> > But, doesn't gcc just automatically promote that 0 to 64 bits, as it's
> > really a pointer?
> 
> Not when passing it trough a varargs ellipsis. How would it know the 0 was 
> a pointer?
> 
/me learns to take a closer look at the code before replying...

It's more than ok with me then.