Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] GnomeMeeting on 2.6

["Damien Sandras" <dsandras seconix com>]

Hi Johnny,

I'm interested in results with Seti home not running. Nothing indicates
if Seti home has a good behavior or not.

What are your communications and responsiveness results on 2.6.1 without
SETI and with various settings of P_HAS_SEMAPHORES?

Try moving windows and do usual things and see if it has impact over the
sound quality. Is the GUI slow only when Seti is eating the CPU ?

Le 30/1/2004, "Johnny Strom" <jonny strom netikka fi> a écrit:

>Hi
>
>Now I did a test with P_HAS_SEMAPHORES = 1 it is the same as with 0,
>so the sound is bad with seti running but it seems to be a littla better
>than when P_HAS_SEMAPHORES was 0. If I run seti with nice level 19 then
>it is ok. So now with 2.6.1 kernel and P_HAS_SEMAPHORES = 1 it the best
>so far.
>
>But still it is not like it was in the 2.4 kernel.
>
>It seems like that GM is punished bye the schedular or something,
>the gui becomes reel slow, note that if I try to start other
>applications so are the gui fast on the other applications.
>
>And with seti and GM running so is the load getting high:
>load average: 6,75, 3,61, 3,99
>
>
>Could it be becous that GM dose a lot of I/O all the time?
>I think there are stuff in the kernel now that looks at that.
>
>
>Cheers Johnny
>
>
>
>Johnny Strom wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Now I am testing this with David Quental, so if I am compiling
>> at the samt time as GM is running then I get a lot of cuts in the sound
>> with P_HAS_SEMAPHORES = 0. This is with 2.6.1 kernel.
>>
>>
>> !Note that without any cpu intensive processes like seti or
>> compilation so is the sound fine.
>>
>>
>> I will send an other mail in some minutes where I put
>> P_HAS_SEMAPHORES = 1 and repport what happens.
>>
>> brb
>>
>> Cheers Johnny
>>
>>
>> Damien Sandras wrote:
>>
>>> Who is using the 2.6 kernel and is ready to test the latest changes with
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Craig, given the fact that many packagers will compile on 2.4, what is
>>> your suggestion?
>>>
>>> I tried on the 2.4 kernel to force the P_HAS_SEMAPHORES to 0 and I have a
>>> bad sound quality when compiling, which I had not with P_HAS_SEMAPHORES
>>> set to 1.
>>>
>>> The problem becomes complex. Having a bad sound quality is not
>>> problematic. What was problematic on 2.6 was to have people having bad
>>> sound quality as soon as they were moving a window.
>>>
>>> What are your comments?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>>
>>> Damien
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
>>> Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
>>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
>Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list