Ya, After a bit of healthy arguments, I feel we have the right thing now. Let the games begin =) On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 14:58, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Curtis C. Hovey"> > > > I'm going to make a draft of the current and historical gnome language > > bindings. I'll ask the maintainers (I know some are unmaintained) to > > review my summary. Once I've gotten feedback I'll prepare a patch for > > review and CVS commit. > > Rock, thanks very much! We just lodged a bug about this today! > > > In the case of unmaintained language bindings, should we include some > > information about resurrecting them if they are in cvs.gnome.org? The > > case I'm think of is objective-gnome, which is long neglected, but could > > have satisfied my requirements and I may update it. > > Yeah, I think so. For the same reasons we'd include historical information > about GNOME 1.x bindings. > > Thanks very much! > > - Jeff -- Sean Harshbarger | "Only two things are infinite, harshy dersoldat org | the universe and human stupidity, http://harshy.homelinux.org | and I'm not sure about the former." http://coaster.sf.net | - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Key fingerprint = 086A AA96 51DD D84D 3E64 1B26 778F 2335 C828 E736
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part