Re: The state of our web site and standards
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: iain ximian com (Iain)
- Cc: veillard redhat com, gnome-web-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: The state of our web site and standards
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
> How many people run a validator on sites they go to? I would imagine a
> VERY VERY small minority.
I go around filing bugs at people whose sites dont validate when I have
connections with them (I'm currently having discussions with the RH web
team)
> So basically, I think having a standards compliant website, while nice,
> isn't all that important, and there's far more important things to do
> with the website. It's definatly not "an embarassment" or whatever Telsa
> claimed it was.
Actually now the gnome foundation is officially created in California one
thing that should be checked is how californian disability access law
affects them and sites they notionally manage.
With linux.org.uk the only way I got rid of the 'obscure browser x messes
up on your site' was to make it validate. It took a couple of hours and it
looked the same before and after
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]