Re: [PATCH] unalias MIME types in application cache



Am Donnerstag, den 11.05.2006, 16:19 +0200 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
> On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 18:04 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 25.04.2006, 11:26 +0200 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
> > > On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 16:31 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > > The attached patch should fix bug 314952 [1] by unaliasing MIME types
> > > > before inserting the associated applications into the cache.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314952
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The xdg_mime_ calls needs to be protected by the gnome_vfs_mime_mutex
> > > lock. I noticed some other calls in that files that weren't protected
> > > and am fixing them now.
> > > 
> > > However, I don't think this is the right way to solve this bug. I think
> > > update-desktop-database should do the unaliasing. That way every app
> > > doesn't have to do this itself each time it loads the mimeinfo.cache
> > > file. Don't you think this would be better?
> > 
> > I don't think it is a good idea to put unaliasing code into
> > update-desktop-database, because it adds much complexity (mime type
> > caching, parsing etc..) We already do much unaliasing at runtime, and
> > clearly, we would either have to parse the XML files ourselves, or - if
> > we read the alias cache - depend on a previous update-mime-database run,
> > which would make the currently orthogonal concept with a completely
> > separate cache only containing the .desktop file information less simple
> > and traceable. Shouldn't the association of these two caches be the
> > client's job?
> 
> Thats a fair reason. Can you fix up the locking and commit it?

Done (HEAD, gnome-2-14).

-- 
Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]