Re: Dependency question for gnome dictionary

[Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>]

Hi all,

On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 08:06 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:

> > > I'd like to propose it for inclusion in the 2.14 release: I can
> > > guarantee API/ABI stability, and its API is documented following the
> > > release rules (gtk-doc says 75% symbols coverage, but I plan to add more
> > > as soon as it lands in HEAD).
> >
> > Inclusion in platform or in desktop? I'd assume desktop, which means
> > there are less demands on stability.
> 
> Yeah. Typically this kind of 'micro-library' has gotten in the desktop
> without much scrutiny, which is fine. I don't see any reason why we'd
> say no, ebassi.

Thanks.

Ciao,
 Emmanuele.

-- 
Emmanuele Bassi - <ebassi gmail com>
Log: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net