Re: use and abuse of shadows :)
- From: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>
- To: Alex Combas <ghetto_samurai shaw ca>
- Cc: gnome-themes-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: use and abuse of shadows :)
- Date: 15 Jun 2003 10:49:15 +0200
Il ven, 2003-06-13 alle 11:55, Alex Combas ha scritto:
> Here is something that bothers me.
> My application icons don't seem to have a consistent light source,
> some of them have light coming from directly in front but others
> seem to have the light coming down from above.
> Either way, i wish they could be more consistent.
> Ive included another small screen shot, in this picture the foot icon
> has a bottom shadow but the gimp, gnome-terminal, gaim, rhythmbox, emacs
> and logout icons all have drop shadows. Then we have the Home icon, as
> well as the bluefish, mozilla, evolution, xchat, and gconf icons that
> have no shadow at all.
Well as you can see icons come from different project, so...
> What is the proper way to draw shadows?
Good question. Let's go to read HIG.
There are 2 prospectives:
* table prospective, used for objects/documents/applications icons
* shelf prospective, used for toolbars and menus
Plus, all icons should be designed as if:
* there is lighting coming from the upper left corner, with a soft
drop-shadow cast within the icon's 48x48 (used in table
* there is a light source placed above the "camera", casting a
shadow down (used in shelf prospective)
So, now there is a little incoherence: the application menu (and panel
launchers too?). There are apps icons (so table prosp) placed in a menu
(so shelf prospective). And the same icons are used in preferences:// or
application:// in nautilus :-(
The only trick in my mind is build up 48x48 icons (typically used in
nautilus) using the table prospective and a 32x32 ones using shelf.
And now a little question from myself: what about emblems???? Table or
shelf???????? It should be shelf, you use them only in file manager and
they should be objects.
] [Thread Prev