[gnome-summary] Re: copyright change for gnome summary

[Sri Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>]

> <quote who="Sri Ramkrishna">
> 
> > I plan on changing the copyright on the gnome summary starting next week
> > to Creative Commons. Anybody have any issues to this?  Interviews,
> > editorials whatever will be put under creative commons.  Currently, it's
> > copyrighted The Gnome Project.  Which I don't believe is a legal entity
> > (or is it?)
> 
> Creative Commons is a website, not a license, nor a entity to which you can
> assign copyright. I don't think anyone would hugely object to allowing their
> content to be released under one of the Creative Commons licenses, such as
> the ShareAlike one.

Right, I put everything under the Creative Common's license umbrella.  
Thanks for correcting that.  Probably the ShareAlike one would be best.


> In terms of copyright holders, 'The GNOME Project' is a tenuous one, for
> sure. I'd recommend the cheap and easy "articles owned by their authors" and
> ensuring you get agreement on ShareAlike licenses or whatever you choose to
> standardise on.

Great!  Thanks :)

sri