[gnome-slackware]Re: Gnome-slackware digest, Vol 1 #5 - 6 msgs

[Guybrush Threepwood <elric fibertel com ar>]

On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 14:01, gnome-slackware-request gnome org wrote:
> Send Gnome-slackware mailing list submissions to
> 	gnome-slackware gnome org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-slackware
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	gnome-slackware-request gnome org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	gnome-slackware-admin gnome org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gnome-slackware digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: RE: Hello (Eric Hutchinson)
>    2. RE: Hello (reddog83)
>    3. Re: RE: Hello (xavier ordoquy)
>    4. Re: RE: Hello (Igor Popik)
>    5. Re: RE: Hello (xavier ordoquy)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:40:48 -0800 (PST)
> From: Eric Hutchinson <sanityimp yahoo com>
> Subject: Re: [gnome-slackware]RE: Hello
> To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> Reply-To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> 
> /usr/lib/mozilla
> 
> its parellel to the netscape package. It should be
> packaged similarly.
> 
> --- Blackguard666 <blackguard666 vibros-land net>
> wrote:
> > It is a REALY GOOD question, It's interesting me
> > too.
> > 
> > Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:30, vous avez écrit :
> > > I have enough room on my hard drive to build
> > Mozilla if you would like?
> > > BUt where do we send the stripped down binaries to
> > after they are done?
> > > Just acouple of things.
> > > Nathan
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gnome-slackware mailing list
> > > Gnome-slackware gnome org
> > >
> >
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-slackware
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnome-slackware mailing list
> > Gnome-slackware gnome org
> >
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-slackware
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> http://sports.yahoo.com
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> From: reddog83 <reddog83 chartermi net>
> To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:08:50 -0500
> Subject: [gnome-slackware]RE: Hello
> Reply-To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> 
> Nope that is not what Pat want's for Gnome.
> He want's all Gnome based packages in the /opt/gnome directory 
> sorry not the /usr directory.
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 3
> Subject: Re: [gnome-slackware]RE: Hello
> From: xavier ordoquy <xordoquy aurora-linux com>
> To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> Date: 21 Feb 2002 09:28:50 +0100
> Reply-To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> 
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 05:08, reddog83 wrote:
> > Nope that is not what Pat want's for Gnome.
> > He want's all Gnome based packages in the /opt/gnome directory 
> > sorry not the /usr directory.
> 
> Neither it is want we want.
> 
> Igor ? still around ?
> 
> -- 
>  Xavier Ordoquy, Aurora-linux
>  "The software said 'runs on Win95 or better,' so I installed it on
> Linux"
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 4
> Subject: Re: [gnome-slackware]RE: Hello
> From: Igor Popik <igipop wsfiz edu pl>
> To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> Date: 21 Feb 2002 12:35:06 +0100
> Reply-To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> 
> W li=B6cie z czw, 21-02-2002, godz. 09:28, xavier ordoquy pisze:=20
> > On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 05:08, reddog83 wrote:
> > > Nope that is not what Pat want's for Gnome.
> > > He want's all Gnome based packages in the /opt/gnome directory=20
> > > sorry not the /usr directory.
> >=20
> > Neither it is want we want.
> hmm, ok, /opt maybe isn't the best place (well, /opt/gnome is more like win=
> dows c:\Program Files\), but i guess we should build packages with /opt/gno=
> me(2) prefix... to maintain compatibility or whatever...
> 
> > Igor ? still around ?
> Yep ;-)
> 
> --=20
> :: Igor Popik, THrull ircnet   =20
> :: http://www.netkrab.com, http://gadu.gnu.pl
> :: mailto:igipop wsfiz edu pl, mailto:thrull slackware pl
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 5
> Subject: Re: [gnome-slackware]RE: Hello
> From: xavier ordoquy <xordoquy aurora-linux com>
> To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> Date: 21 Feb 2002 13:31:37 +0100
> Reply-To: gnome-slackware gnome org
> 
> 
> > hmm, ok, /opt maybe isn't the best place
> > (well, /opt/gnome is more like windows c:\Program Files\),
> > but i guess we should build packages with /opt/gnome(2) prefix...
> > to maintain compatibility or whatever...
> 
> mmm, I badly said what I wanted to ;)
> /opt/gnome(2) is a must since the gnome -> gnome2 translation will get
> some delay to the users (evolution and a few other apps needs to be
> ported) so one may want to keep both gnome versions.
> 
> > > Igor ? still around ?
> > Yep ;-)
> 
> Did you started looking at garnome ?
> 
> MCArkan
> 
> -- 
>  Xavier Ordoquy, Aurora-linux
>  "The software said 'runs on Win95 or better,' so I installed it on
> Linux"
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-slackware mailing list
> Gnome-slackware gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-slackware
> 
> 
> End of Gnome-slackware Diges

Hi. I think there is no problem in the location of default gnome 2
packages, for example, before installing gnome 1.4 from the slack cd, i
made /opt/gnome to be a symbolic link to /usr/local/, so now gnome is
technically on /usr/local.