Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- From: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity dbc dk>
- To: Trever Adams <trever_Adams bigfoot com>
- cc: gnome pilot list <gnome-pilot-list gnome org>, calendar-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnomecal/evolution vs gnome-pilot
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 01:37:14 +0100 (CET)
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Eskil Heyn Olsen wrote:
> problem. And the amount of data on the disk is the same in the two
> scenarios.
Last sentence is bull, if gnome-pilot-evolutiond also caches modified
records, then the disk usage would be bigger (but we're talking calendar
entries, not mpg's)
/dev/eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
