Re: ORBit thread safe ? was Re: gpilotd & corba
- From: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity trinity dbc bib dk>
- To: gnome-pilot-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ORBit thread safe ? was Re: gpilotd & corba
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 04:00:30 +0200 (MET DST)
Oy...
> to work around this with the current set of lock functions? What will be
> your reference for the list? Someone should be able to do multiple list
> ops between a lock and an unlock.
Two ways.
1) does the head change ? Afaics it's allways the same, and it's
dataelement is NULL (thats the behaviour I've observed, whether its a
coincidence or not, I don't know).
2) Store the mutex as first element of list, complicating the use of
foreach.
3) Hope to whatever gods one worships, that I'll only be locking less then
10 lists in a few places, so I can just create a load of mutexes and lock
at free will.
[Child to parent signalling]
> If the CORBA stuff isn't too much of a pain, it sounds ok to me.
It should be ok. The child process could get a cookie from the parent, use
it in a call like request_completed(cookie,request).
> I will be starting a gncal conduit. I really need one right now, so I
Will you be using syncabs ?
> > If I at least got paid, it might be ok.
> Ugh, no pay !?!?!
Nope, volunteer work. But it's a students bar, so I don't feel like a
complete ninny.
> power estimation for VLSI chips, and parallel digital test generation for
> my research. I am also interested in many other things of course :).
Should bloody hope so :)
eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]