Re: sample nautilus SRPM does not build on RH 7.0

[Paul Jenner <paul jenner ioko365 com>]

On 21 May 2001 10:02:28 -0700, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> Do you have the errata from Red Hat 7.0 applied?

I should have had but I'll try the vanilla SPEC again on a patched box.

I agree with comments in this thread that the "enable-more-warnings" is
useful for compilation and that those who don't know how to interpret
and fix such things should be using binary RPMS.  However, generally I
tend to think that if software is packaged for a distribution then it
must be buildable on that distribution without changes.  After all,
that's what packaging process is for.

Hope these comments are useful,

Paul

-- 
Paul Jenner
System Administrator
ioko365

E-mail: paul jenner ioko365 com

UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL E-MAIL IS NOT WELCOME AT THIS ADDRESS