On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 18:16, Miles Lane wrote: > On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 10:07, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:19, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 24 Jun 2002, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > > > > User-defined sharing is hard, but most people need something simple :) > > > > Just share ~/Public (everything but http) and ~/Sites (http) and some > > > > system-wide share akin (/System/Sites and /System/Public or some such), > > > > and you're done. > > > > > > Are these paths "virtual" and handled by GNOME VFS ? If not, are we going > > > to create a new system directory hierarchy ? > > > > > > If we do, I fear we may as well scrap the idea of using any packages > > > verbatim from Debian, RedHat or whatnot :) > > > > It was just an example. We'd probably put that under a /home/system or > > something like that. > > Does it make sense to set up an HTTP server for gnome-os? > I highly doubt it, since most home users (and certainly laptop > users) do not have static IP addresses, let alone DNS > registrations. And ? Local networks are common, even for home users, and laptop users would probably like to be able to preview their websites before uploading it. -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part