Re: Status + Future

[Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>]

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 05:27, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> ons 2002-07-24 klockan 02.37 skrev Bastien Nocera:
> > On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 00:31, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > > So,
> > > 
> > > Where are we at, what should we do? :-)
> > 
> > 1) Look for potential caveats in the desktop
> > 
> > 2) Write the code to sort it out
> > 
> > 3) Try to get it integrated somewhere.
> > 
> > What I mean is that there is no need to rush build a server or that sort
> > of thing. There are plenty of smalls tasks that are easy to take on
> > one-by-one, and that make the whole project advance.
> 
> This is probably true, but if we have things setup and the possibility
> to make a CD it will be much more clear and real than just guessing what
> needs to be done.
> 
> It will also feel more like we are progressing than just doing little
> here and little there. I don't think we _need_ this for the project but
> I'm pretty sure that it would _feel_ better for those involved. I'm sure
> I would feel that we have something and that it's much easier for me to
> push myself to hack on it if I can see the progress, not just know that
> whatever I last hacked on can be used sometime in the future.

This summarizes where "I'm at" too.

-Seth