Re: gsf api thoughts
- From: Dom Lachowicz <doml appligent com>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- Cc: gnome-office-list gnome org, abiword-dev abisource com, gnumeric-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gsf api thoughts
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 00:26:47 -0400
Hi Jody,
I'm actually not convinced that two of your virtual methods are needed. Particularly, these are:
GsfInput::Dup
GsfOutput::Close
I really don't see the why dup was needed. In some cases, it ref's an internal stream and returns. In other cases, it opens a new copy of its resource and returns. Fine, but what uses this?
My major concern was with Close, though. I think that to close a stream, one would simply unref the object. When the ref count goes to 0, the object closes any internal streams or frees the relevant data. I see no need for both Close and unref to exist, mainly because there's nothing one can do with a closed stream besides unref it.
As for gsf_output_printf, are you suggesting something that would be functionally equivalent to the following code, or am I misunderstanding you?
char * str = g_strdup_printf ( format, args ) ;
gsf_output_write(str, strlen(str));
g_free(str);
Dom
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 10:47 PM, Jody Goldberg wrote:
libgsf development is coming along. Tambet has finished a first
pass at zip file import and has started on zip export. It is now
trivial to add a wrapper which would support the OO style zip files.
Dom and I discussed a doc meta data api, and appear to have collided
on an implementation. However, while playing with converting the
rest of gnumeric's export plugins to use libgsf I've come across 2
api issues that could use some imput.
1) gsf_output_printf (and friends)
On the input side I got a gsf_input_textline class to handle reading
text sources line by line (1 byte encoding or utf8). That seems
reasonable. Line by line text seems like a format. On the output
side it is less clear. It would be useful to have the printf
routine in the base class, but this introduces an asymetry in the
interface. Any preferences ?
2) output unref vs close. Should unrefing an output close it ?
I suspect so given that any other behaviour would be much harder to
implement.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]