Re: [Fwd: Re: Has the end come?]

["Richard J. Mancusi" <vrman execpc com>]

I completely agree.  That is why I said "obviously doesn't mean GnuCash
shouldn't be in Gnome Office".  I would appreciate it if we drop the
subject.  I thought that I was doing a service to the community by
providing information about a competitive product.

again - sorry for the misunderstanding
Rich



Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> tor 2002-04-18 klockan 03.09 skrev Richard J. Mancusi:
> > I re-read my email and now see how poorly it was written.  In no way
> > did I mean to imply that GnuCash is not good software or that it
> > didn't belong in Gnome Office.  The reason I forwarded the Moneydance
> > email was exactly opposite.  It was meant as a demo of the importance
> > of GnuCash.  What should be in an "Office" package - difficult to say.
> > Just because MS Money isn't in MS Office obviously doesn't mean GnuCash
> > shouldn't be in Gnome Office.  I was trying to say - hey, is the
> > Monydance situation all the more reason to take a good look at GnuCash.
> > I am VERY sorry for the error.
> >     
>
> MS Project isn't part of GNOME Office either. I think one of the reasons
> for neither of these applications not to be in there is that they make
> more money to sell them outside (since most people won't need it and
> would object to paying a lot of extra for applications they don't need).
>
> We on the other hand has the opportunity to create a better office
> suite, since we can provide everything others provide and also provide
> the extra functionality of GnuCash and MrProject (and probably other
> applications too).
>
> Regards,
>   Mikael Hallendal
>
>