Re: RFP: CompoundStorage document



On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> We have a working solution for that - called bonobo. The bonobo storage
> interface is IMO the way to go. AFAIK we also have libefs and OLE2
> bonobo monikers. libefs also supports encryptions and transactions. What
> else do we need?

The bonobo storage interface is useful, libefs is not.  To use Jim
Getty's parlance, lets not make the swamp bigger.  There are already
too damn many structured formats.  Adding yet another which is
completely unknown to most other tools seems like a losing
proposition.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]