Re: GNOME Office list, and Sun/AbiWord
- From: Sri Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- To: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- Cc: pseelig mail Uni-Mainz de,Torsten Schulz <Torsten Schulz germany sun com>,gnome-office-list gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org,gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Office list, and Sun/AbiWord
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 06:25:53 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> To: pseelig@mail.Uni-Mainz.de
> Cc: Torsten Schulz <Torsten.Schulz@germany.sun.com>,
> gnome-office-list@gnome.org, gnome-devel-list@gnome.org,
> gnome-hackers@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: GNOME Office list, and Sun/AbiWord
>
> > Qt/KDE advocate, i was wondering from a technological point of view
> > why for C++ based (right, isn't it?) StarOffice, Sun/Ex-StarDivision
> > didn't focus on Qt which is already a very advanced, C++ based, cross
> > platform toolkit? Wouldn't that have been a natural choice?
>
> Star Office predates Qt. Its old enough that when they did their first talk
> about the Linux port they were doing comparisons with OS/2
I'm assuming that they might roll in some of their UI features into gtk?
sri
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]